Essay on “Analyze, Don’t Summarize” by Michael Berube Essay

Berube analogize students essays and watching sports commentary on ESPN, because students tend to sum in their essays instead of analyzing it. Berube uses an example as to what he is trying to explain that the world of sports is metacommentary and no one actually summarizes on how the game is being played. Instead they analyze, they incisively pourboire out the all important(predicate) part of the game. In the tenth paragraph he quotes Well, Tony let me level out that last night, the bolshie Sox swept the Tigers and crept to within three games of the Yankees. And thus he quotes that Im estimable pointing out that the Sox won 3-1, on a four hitter by Schilling, while the Yanks blew another late-inning lead. rascal 304 Berube uses this comparison to explain that no one summarizes the sports because no one in the sports world confuses summaries with analyses, meaning that he discuss the importance of what a dissertation should look like.He quotes that When I tell them that an thoughtfulness is not a thesis he wants students to write a paper in which the thesis can be arguable and to bring to the publics attention, except as sports commentary do pointing out the essential parts of the game. Berubes response to students writing is to Assume a vatical readership composed of people who have already read the book. That means that you shouldnt say In class, we discussed the importance in the clam chowder in chapter five. and more important it means you dont have to summarize the novel Berube most convincing analogy would be when he quoted the Red Sox won 3-1with the Yankees. He gave two specific examples of what the difference of analyzing and summarizing. What he wants his written document look like. Well he uses the comparison with sports because what he wants his students to know that what he looks for is a paper that catches the publics attention.He wants main points just as commentators argue about when a game is being played. Berubes least convincin g analogy was when he says that sport talks argon nothing but an entire entourage of chattering parasites. What did he unfeignedly meant if this is what he is trying to compargon with his students writings and sports. This is wherefore sports monocommentary is supposed to be doing arguing about the game not just Chattering like he says. The author expresses the difference between analyzing and summarizing barely by contradicting himself with the rest of the essay, because he mentioned he wants his papers to be arguable just as sports talks should be. Berube saysthat sports talks analogy is useful plainly as a handy way of distinguishing between summary and analysis. When a student paper cites textual evidence so compelling and strange that it makes me go back and read passage in a uncertainty (good) he quotes and a suggests that a novel conclusion fails to resolve the questions and tensions elevated by the rest of the narrative or makes claim that are nowadays contradicted by the literary text its self (bad) (page 304)The significance of his point that an watching is not a thesis means because a thesis is ordinarily an arguable piece of writing and in most cases factual and an observation is what is perceived by one at the moment meaning single you can base an opinion of what you just saw. In this paragraph Berube emphasizes his point on analyzing, summarizing, and sports talks. The above paragraph shows the authors black and vacuous thinking about his students papers. He believes that there are only two choices one is the right choice and the other is not, decision making whether you sound right or not, I simply know an A paper when I see one. Audience of Berubes essay could be anyone, but most likely his students. According to paragraph fifteen, hes been using ESPN or sport talks as his source to equate it with his students essays. As I get to the end of the essay, I realized that Berube wasnt able to answer his own question. But he was able to s uccessfully compare analyzing and summarizing by giving easy and intelligible reasons and resources.