Looking At Great Gatsby English Literature Essay

feel At Great Gatsby English Literature EssayIn tom Burnam show The Eyes of Dr. Eckleburg A Re-examination The Great Gatsby, he dedicates for fightd his interlingual rendition of the text. He believes that though the Great Gatsby was a great work of disks it is a flawed one. As it lacks something, he believes that the author, F. Scott Fitzgerald made the mis spend a penny of placing to oftentimes of himself, as the author and of his life into the characters. turkey cock Burnam, in his essay, also delegate preceding a point about the novel beingness more than about c ar slightness than illusion and integrity. Tom Burnam posits that there is little specialism mingled with the author and the character as he believes that not crimson out the most skillful novelist could make us, the readers accept pass Carrarway as to the full responsible for composing the wonderful description in chapter iii. In his essay The Eyes of Dr. Eckleburg A Re-examination The Great Gatsby, h e believes that lack lies within stems from Fitzgerald placing himself in the novel, how constantly unwittingly, stating thatThe book, great as it is, still f everys ill-considered of its possibilities because its energies are spent in two directions. If The Great Gatsby revealed to us only its relay transmitter, it would be incomparable. Revealing, as it does, perhaps a little too much of the soulfulness who created it, it be conform tos somewhat less sharp, less pointed, more diffused in its effect.Tom Burnam stated in his essay that The Great Gatsby was also a scuttle savet on the nature and values, or lack of them, of the reckless ones, the reckless ones being the rich. My own rendering of the text is in short, a commentary on the generation and society left by and by the First homo War. This interpretation follows from F. Scott Fitzgeralds other novels and short stories as they all follow a equal theme. As I will show, there are multiple interpretations of the book howe ver some are more logical than others. During the First World War thousands of Americans dissectd, despite joining the conflicting April 1917 and this, quite understandably, created disharmony in society and also lead those returning from war to try to come to terms with their experiences. Although Fitzgerald himself never actually went to war he was called up to fight but the war ended before he was called upon to make the travel to Europe. This is in contrast to Gatsby who we are told tried very hard to die during the war and for that earned great honors from every Allied government- even Montenegro, little Montenegro down on the Adriatic Sea. This romanticized expression of Montenegro is one of the things described as enchanted by means ofout including Gatsbys life and Daisy. It is here in chapter IV that we survive the first impression that Nick does not wholly trust Gatsby and although it doesnt determination long, it is evidence enough to suggest that there is something not quite right field about Gatsby and the way in which Nick reveres him. Fitzgerald intentionally threads question into every account of Gatsbys past and Nick begins to wonder if there wasnt something a little sinister about him, after all. This lack of integrity is a running theme of the novel and although care is given as the discernment for Jordan liking Nick earlier in the chapter she is described by Nick as incurably dishonest and although this is written in hindsight we, as readers, sanctimony help but question everything she has said up to this point, until Fitzgerald reassures us by telling us Nick is one of the few honest people he has ever known. This self-justification that the reader is not entirely sure of is similar to that of Stevens in remains of the Day, when we suspect him of eavesdropping he attempts to reassure us by say I could not help but get the gist of what was being said. As we can see, there is a distinct difference between the authors voice and int entions and the narrators voice. Undoubtedly Fitzgerald intended us to be suspicious of Gatsby throughout the novel until we begin to feel genuinely sorry for him. After the atrocities that happened during the war it is easy to sympathize with those who lost their faith. It has been suggested the eye of Dr T.J Eckleburg were put in after the cover illustration had been finished and Fitzgerald added them in homage to it, however I feel that the symbolism is far too poignant for this to have been a mere after-thought. For me, these eyes are directly representing the eyes of theology, a God that has been abandoned and left to decay such(prenominal) as his eyes, dimmed a little by many painless days, under sun and rain,brooded on over the solemn dumping ground. Burnam uses the examples of careless brainish in computer backup for his claim to the central theme of the text being the tragedy that this has brought to all affected by it and onlyGatsby and he alone, barring Caraway surviv es sound and intact in character. I cannot accept that Fitzgerald wrote Gatsby in the sole purpose to put across the hazards of bad driving I can, therefore, only speculate that this is a smaller issue than Burnam makes it out to be and instead would suggest that the references to driving are there simply as pointers or symbols of foreshadowing the accidents that slip away later in the novel. The passage with the amputated wheel gives those who return to the book a pointer as to the ending, with the line You dont understandI wasnt driving. Afterwards, as a solution to the problem, the criminal suggests putting her in reverse to which the response is but the wheels send off In a very abstract way this episode is a taste of things to come as Gatsby tries to beat onagainst the current and go back the past which poverty and war robbed him of. While Burnams essay simply puts forward his alternative view of The Great Gatsby I cant help but feel he has taken the symbols at too deep-a-l evel. Burnam says the reason he does this is due to the confusion of themes and duality of the symbol-structure, of which Fitzgerald seems to have been unaware. The bookfalls short of its possibilities because its energies are spent in two directions revealing both the protagonist and author in great detail making it somewhat less sharp, less pointed, more diffused in its effect. By this, Burnam is simply state he thinks Fitzgerald should have been more careful in allowing himself to come through in his work and stuck to telling the story of Jay Gatsby. Sometimes we must take a text at face value and not experience too deep as not all novels have such unfathomable depths