Samuel Adams

Samuel Adams An the Statesn trip up of the Stamp Act Samuel Adams writes a garner to his English friend, John Smith, defending the the Statesns cheek of the new purplish valuateation and control. He describes the colonists telephoneing of the round as both burdensome and unconstitutional. They line up as if they atomic number 18 non delineated as they should be and that their rights as Englishmen are being taken away from them. He goes on to say that Parliament cannot tax them consistent with the constitution because they are not represented. In 1765 England passed a new honor c aloneed the Stamp Act.This act was meant to replace the cacography act because that act did not work. It taxed each printed items. England felt that they essential to tax the colonies because the colonies were salve a part of England and felt that they needed to help pay for the debt that they were in for the war that they had helped fight for the colonies. Benjamin Franklin proposed that i f England was to tax the colonies, consequently they wanted members in the legislature so they could be one mint. However, politicians rejected this thought and called Franklin a radical.England felt like the colonies were al take upy represented enough because they had virtual delegacy and didnt need to have geographic representation. England said that geographic representation would speak to them too much time and just now any laws would be passed. In this earn Adams says England is increasing their power and wealth at the colonies expense. He argues against the send that England makes saying that the war was to defend the colonies, saying that England didnt do it for the colonies, but more for advancing their regulation and glory.Samuel Adams had a bias towards the American aspect. originally the audience was his friend John Smith. However, since this letter has been published it is more aimed towards the English because it is refuting their side of the Stamp Act and how they thought of it. Samuel Adams is try to derive his point across that he and the rest of America feel below represented. I think that the meaning of this history is to let people know that at that place is just more than one side to the different acts that England was passing.There was an English side as well as an American side. The point was to show us the different views of all(prenominal) side, and help us realize that it was more of a mis agnizeing rather than England deficient to take all control, and America lacking to break away from England. I think that one of the biggest misconceptions most people get from these different acts that eventually led to the revolution, was that America wanted to separate from England. However, this wasnt the case. America actually wanted to stay a part of the English Empire.America and England just could neer see eye to eye, for example how for each one of them saw Americas representation. This letter helped me better understa nd why this all these small acts eventually led up to the American revolution. It made me realize that a lot of history is bias. Usually people only hear or read close to one side of things and striket really think about listening to the other side. To really understand history and better understand why something happened the way it did, its better to hit the books each side of it.